sakejump
SAKE LEADERS SUMMIT

2027

Ask the question, check it with data, return it to the field.

Jul 7 (Wed) to 9 (Fri), 2027Tokyo Big Sight (inside FERMEX)In preparation
Intro

Turning what has been argued into the next moves.

SAKE LEADERS SUMMIT has been building its argument since the first edition in 2025. Rule-making for international markets, a rethink of the sake production licence, succession and generational change, the careers of the people who brew. What brewers, government, researchers, distributors and overseas practitioners have brought to the table now adds up to real depth. 2027 gathers it into one place. Not to lay the issues out and stop there, but to reach the point where each theme leaves the room with who starts on what. The figures it will take are being collected now.

Themes

The themes in preparation

Each continues a theme from an earlier edition. Rather than repeating the same question, we put figures where there were none, then debate it again. This is not the whole list.

Brewing as a place to work: traditional industry and start-up

As production systems change, how should traditional, cultural craft become a place people want to work?

In 2026

In 2026, session 9 asked what it takes for toji and kurabito to make brewing a lifelong job. What was heard, though, was the experience of those who managed to stay.

What 2027 asks

Sake and Japanese wine are both fermented brews, but they sit differently as industries. Sake is spoken of as a traditional industry and as culture. Japanese wine is an imported culture, sits in a promotion category, and in business terms is closer to a start-up. Shochu and craft sake each occupy their own place on that axis. Where norms are not filtered through tradition, both working conditions and gender gaps should look different. The same question set across industries is how we find where the conditions worth working under actually are.

How the evidence is gathered

An anonymous survey across industries, with an organisational and an individual ballot. Answers are processed statistically; no business or individual is named.

Survey open (closes November 30, 2026)Go to the hub →
Overseas markets: strategy and the state's role

In opening overseas markets, what structural fixes should the state and business each take on?

In 2026

In 2026, session 1 took up North American case studies and transparency in export contracts, while session 2 asked who defines sake's backbone. The export floor and the institutional side sat side by side.

What 2027 asks

With the domestic market contracting, hopes have gathered around growth abroad, yet each new measure has been stacked on without looking back at what worked and what did not. The subject here is not individual effort but the structures that keep repeating: measures that run once and lead nowhere; success measured in counts, of participating breweries, of importers, of meetings held, without ever checking whether those counts turned into sales or a lasting presence; and staff rotating every few years so that nothing long-term carries over. We collect these as cases, and take them as far as a proposal for where the budget and the time should go.

How the evidence is gathered

Evidence comes from three directions. Businesses that took part in the measures contribute cases through an anonymous survey. The public bodies running them are asked directly what was done and how success was measured. And then the destination side: Japan's export statistics and the import data held by destination customs authorities show different things, so we want the top destinations matched against each other, at least. That one starts with a request for cooperation.

Case-study survey being designed

Note: figures on the domestic market and on exports follow the National Tax Agency's Sake no Shiori (trends in taxed shipments and exports of sake). Wherever a specific figure appears in the text, the edition and reference date are given alongside it.

The pool of producers: licences and succession

To grow a sake market in decline, who should do what?

In 2026

In 2026, session 4 mapped the institutional facts from a survey of 116 brewers and successors, sessions 5 and 6 went on to design how new licences could be issued, and session 7 took up the reality of business succession.

What 2027 asks

The debate currently splits between putting dormant licences to use first and issuing new ones as a matter of fairness, and it has stalled without the two sides meeting. Rather than putting that to the vote again, 2027 asks every side to bring the evidence its proposal rests on: why this measure grows the market, and on what grounds that can be claimed. The point is to get past hunches and personal conviction. Dormant licences, succession and new licences all go on the same table to be compared.

How the evidence is gathered

An anonymous survey in which each position submits its proposal together with the grounds for it. Claims with nothing behind them are left out of the tabulation.

Survey being designed

Note: figures on the sake market follow the National Tax Agency's Sake no Shiori (trends in taxed shipments of sake). Wherever a specific figure appears in the text, the edition and reference date are given alongside it.

Conference Overview

The venue is Tokyo Big Sight, as in 2026, running as a special programme within the International Fermented and Brewed Food Expo (FERMEX). Room details follow once confirmed.

The programme, speakers and timetable will be announced during the 2026 fiscal year, in step with how the surveys and analysis progress.

DATE
Jul 7 (Wed) to 9 (Fri), 2027
VENUE
Tokyo Big Sight (inside FERMEX)
HOST
camo Inc. / TSO International
STATUS
In preparation: surveys and analysis under way

Read the 2026 debate